BREEDING CONDITIONS REPORT, 2003


RESPONDENT

Joseph Liebezeit

SITE NAME

Prudhoe Bay Oilfield, USA

Contact details (phone/fax//e-mail//address):
503-241-7231/503-241-7925(fax) // jliebezeit@wcs.org // Wildlife Conservation Society, North America Program - Pacific West office, 718 SW Alder Street, Suite 210, Portland, OR 97205, USA

PROJECT DETAILS

Project name:

Nest survival of tundra-nesting birds and human development on the North Slope of Alaska

Start of survey:

End of survey: Team size:

1.06

25.07

2


WEATHER CONDITIONS

Season phenology: late

Weather conditions:

The Kuparuk River broke on 2 June. Upon arrival on 2 June, snow cover in the flat areas was about 80%. On some of the study plots snow depth was >0.5 m. It appeared that the study plots closest to the Beaufort Sea had the deepest snow and highest snow cover. At this site, our study plots range 2-13 km inland from the coastline. The second week of June was particularly cold (near or just below 0øC). July was warmer than June with only one major rainstorm on 3 July.

 

Season temperature: cold
Season humidity:
Date of 50% snow-cover: 5.06
Date of ice-break on rivers: 2.06
Date of final loss of snow: 19.06

BIOTIC CONDITIONS

Rodents abundance evaluation:

low

Breeding conditions:

We discovered and monitored all nests on 12 10-hectare study plots every 3-6 days until nesting fate was determined. We discovered 132 nests of 21 species from 7 June to 15 July. Overall nest density was 68.3 nests/km2 at this site. Of the 132 nests, 49 were discovered off-plot. Sixty-four nests successfully hatched, 54 failed, and we were unable to reliably assess the fate of 14 nests. Most nests failed due to predation (49 of 54 nests, 91%). Other causes of nest failure included: weather (n=1), human-induced (n=1), infertile eggs (n=1), and for unknown reasons (n=2). Mayfield estimates of nesting success for the three most common species were: Lapland Bunting (n=15): 0.509, Pectoral Sandpiper (n=13): 0.539, and Semipalmated Sandpiper (n=19): 0.569.
We conducted three 10-minute point count surveys for potential nest predators on all plots. We conducted a total of 3 replicates of this survey on all plots during the course of the season. A total of 6 potential predators were detected (number of detections in brackets): Common Raven (n=3), Arctic Fox (n=3), Arctic Skua (n=18), and Long-tailed Skua (n=5), Glaucous Gull (n>50). The most common potential predators were Glaucous Gull, Arctic and Long-tailed Skuas.
 

Rodent dynamics:

2 observers over 2 months in the field only observed lemmings a few times. No trend in lemming abundance was apparent during the course of the season. We did not capture lemmings.

Rodent species recorded:

LatinAbundance

Summary of fauna studies:

 

FAUNA IN STUDY AREA

Group of speciesPresenceAbundanceBreedingDetailed studiesComment
arctic foxesYescommonbreedingYes 
lemmingsYesrare   
wadersYesabundanthatchingYes 
swansYescommonbreeding  
geeseYesabundanthatchingYes 
ducksYescommonhatchingYes 
birds of preyYesrare   
buzzardsYesrare   
ptarmigansYescommonhatchingYes 
skuasYesabundantbreedingYes 
pomarine skuasYesrare Yes 
gulls/ternsYesabundantbreedingYes 
owlsYesrare   
passerinesYesabundantfledgingYes 
diversYescommonbreedingYes 
ground squirrelsYesrare   

 

SEABIRD COLONIES

speciesComment

 

WATERBIRD NON-BREEDING AGGREGATIONS

speciesAggregation typeNumberComment
Anser caerulescensroost&feed 80-100
Branta berniclaroost&feed 80-100

 

HUMAN ACTIVITY IN THE STUDY AREA

Human activityComment
area affected by industrial development 

 


Recommended citation

Liebezeit, J.R. (2003). Breeding conditions report for Prudhoe Bay Oilfield, USA, 2003. ARCTIC BIRDS: an international breeding conditions survey. (Online database). Eds. M.Soloviev, P.Tomkovich. . Updated 11 Dec. 2008. Accessed .

 more on citation guidelines

 

HOME PAGE